(Insert image here)

1. Stevens does an excellent job outlining the differences between images and words in his essay. He recognizes each mediums strengths and weaknesses and makes it clear that the two mediums are not interchangeable. Then, as if he was taking a little dig on the power of words he states in his concluding remarks that "Certain pictures can put words to shame." This comment made me reflect on the powerful images I have seen, and if it were possible for words to explain the situation portrayed in the image any better? I think not. Stevens is right. If we are going for an emotion explosion, images can offer that much like an intellectual explosion can happen with words. The difference is that words can convey ideas better, while images convey an overall "feel." Can you feel me?

2. Alright, I loved the essay Grierson wrote comparing advertising techniques to a bunch of mental patients on acid with the message: "You're not worth anything," playing in the backround. Brilliant. It made me wonder what images go through my head everyday? It's scary to think about...

3. In the introductory essay to Chapter 3, Faigley talks about the depth and dynamics visual elements can add to the stories that make up our lives. My older brother, Dustin, went on a church mission for two years while I was still in high school. I could only write letters to him while he was away. This was challenging for me since I found it difficult to tell him stories without him being able to see my facial expressions, or here the influx in my voice. How was he to know when I was being sarcastic? I started doodling figures on the side of my letters...me pulling my hair out, me stabbing a profesor, or maybe just a giant question mark. I also started using different colors to reflect my mood. And I must say, that I felt much better about sending those letters off to him. I believed in the power of visual elements before I even knew what a visual element was...