1. While I was reading our text, I was most intrigued by the section that discussed the benefits of adding visual elements to an argumentative paper. I hope I am not alone when I say that I always got the impression from my educators that pictures and fancy font were off limits for any paper that was supposed to be considered "formal." I remember learning a strict and sterile format in high school...no bells and whistles. But it seems that visual texts are no longer regarded as distractions, but enhancements. Do you agree or disagree with the direction visual texts are heading?
2. I found the end of Ch 7 to be very helpful in thinking about my memoir project. As of now, not every design element that exists in my film supports my argument or overall statement. The list of analysis questions off of which I can use to critique my project will help bring more cohesion to my piece.
3. If I had the choice between creating a photo essay and writing a dry, argumentative paper, I would pick the photo essay any day. Is this true for all students? Are projects that combine mediums "easier" and more fun than just writing a paper because I like being creative, or is our society just more comfortable and adjusted to multi-medium?
Monday, February 9, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1. I do think that it depends on the teacher's preferences. I had a teacher in high school who encourged our font to reflect the tone of the essay. I think if you are doing a RAFT project then changing font can be an interesting addition to the story.
ReplyDelete